Preview

V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY

Advanced search

The subjective concept of morbidity: its assessment and connection with the motivation for treatment in persons who underwent psychosis

https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2020-2-73-79

Abstract

Medication compliance and motivation for treatment, as adaptive- compensatory reactions of patients to the awareness of the fact of their own ill- being, are based on subjective perception of the disorder. To date, there is a shortage of objective methods for assessing the subjective concept of morbidity in psychotic patients.

160 inpatients with psychosis in anamnesis were examined: nosologically according ICD-10 80%—F2, 11%—F3, 9%—F0. A self-questionnaire was adapted to the Russian language for determining the subjective meaning and significance of psychosis (Susi). The results of its internal and external (when compared with data on the severity of productive and negative symptoms, subjective assessment of the severity of the condition and treatment motivation of patients) validation are presented.

Conclusions. The applicability of the concept of subjective morbidity in patients with mental disorders is shown. The role of the subjective attitude to the disease in case of its perception as a destructive life event is associated in patients with a violation of the structure of motivation for treatment. On the contrary, the ability of patients to form a subjective meaning of the disease can be considered as a guarantee of more intense therapeutic motivation.

About the Authors

N. B. Lutova
V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology
Russian Federation


M. Y. Sorokin
V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology
Russian Federation


O. V. Makarevich
V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology
Russian Federation


V. D. Wied
V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology
Russian Federation


References

1. Lutova NB, Petrovskaya IN, Wied VD. Illness insight and medication compliance in psychoses. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2014;1:10-15. (In Russ.).

2. Lutova NB, Sorokin MY, Novikova KE, Vid VD. Subjective perception of psychosis in patients with schizophrenia: the experience of transcultural research. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2018;3:59-64. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31363/2313-7053-2018- 3-59-64

3. Rasskazova EI. Russian version of the illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R): validation in the patients with non-psychotic depressions. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya. 2016;1:123-142. (In Russ.).

4. Sorokin MYu, Lutova NB, Wied VD. Typology of psychiatric patients in regard motivation and treatment engagement. Sotsial’naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya. 2018;28:12-17. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24412/FfoPDvXFBEU

5. Sorokin M.Yu. Gendernye aspekty sub»ektivnogo otnosheniya k perenesennomu psikhozu i motivatsiya patsientok k lecheniyu. Zhenskoe psikhicheskoe zdorov’e—ot isterii k genderno-sensitivnomu podkhodu: sb. nauchnykh trudov. [NMITs im. V.M. Bekhtereva]: avtory-sost.: A.V. Vasil’eva, T.A. Karavaeva; pod obshch. red. N.G. Neznanova.—SPb.: Izd. dom «Alef-Press». 2018; 283-290 (In Russ.)

6. Bock T, Brysinski T, Klapheck K, Bening U, Lenz A, Naber D. Zum subjektiven Sinn von Psychosen. Psychiatrische Praxis. 2010;37:285-291. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248424.

7. Fervaha G, Takeuchi H, Agid O, Lee J, Foussias G, Remington G. Determinants of Patient-Rated and Clinician-Rated Illness Severity in Schizophrenia. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2014;76:924- 930. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09128

8. Guy W. Clinical Global Impressions. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Revised DHEW Publication (ADM). National Institute for Mental Health, Rockville. 1976;218- 222.

9. Haro J, Kamath S, Ochoa S, Novick D, Rele K, Fargas A et al. Clinical Global Impression− Schizophrenia Scale. PsycTESTS Dataset. 2003;. doi: 10.1037/t49685-000

10. Jochems E, Duivenvoorden H, van Dam A, Mulder C, van der Feltz-Cornelis C. Testing the Integral Model of treatment motivation in outpatients with severe mental illness. Motivation and Emotion. 2018;42:816-830. doi: 10.1007/s11031-018-9708-0

11. Klapheck K, Nordmeyer S, Cronjäger H, Naber D, Bock T. Subjective experience and meaning of psychoses: the German Subjective Sense in Psychosis Questionnaire (SUSE). Psychological Medicine. 2011;42:61-71. doi:10.1017/s0033291711001103

12. Noordraven E, Wierdsma A, Blanken P, Bloemendaal A, Mulder C. Depot- medication compliance for patients with psychotic disorders: the importance of illness insight and treatment motivation. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2016;12:269-274.

13. Sorokin M, Lutova N, Wied V. The Role of Treatment Motivation Subsystems in the Overall Structure of Compliance in Patients Undergoing Psychopharmacotherapy. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology. 2017;47:890-894. doi: 10.1007/s11055-017-0486-z

14. Spearing M, Post R, Leverich G, Brandt D, Nolen W. Modification of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale for use in bipolar illness (BP): the CGI- BP. Psychiatry Research. 1997;73:159-171. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00123-6

15. Wiesjahn M, Jung E, Lamster F, Rief W, Lincoln T. Explaining Attitudes and Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication: The Development of a Process Model. Schizophrenia Research and Treatment. 2014;1-11. doi: 10.1155/2014/341545


Review

For citations:


Lutova N.B., Sorokin M.Y., Makarevich O.V., Wied V.D. The subjective concept of morbidity: its assessment and connection with the motivation for treatment in persons who underwent psychosis. V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2020;(2):73-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2020-2-73-79

Views: 1321


ISSN 2313-7053 (Print)
ISSN 2713-055X (Online)