A psychodiagnostic tool for the structural assessment of the social network in patients with schizophrenia: validity and psychometric properties

The aim of the study was to develop a new valid psychometric diagnostic tool for a multi-factor social network assessment of schizophrenic patients, called «The structural assessment of the social network of schizophrenic patients». The new development is based on the social network analysis model elaborated by S. L. Phillips (1981) and translated into Russian by Gurovich I. Ya. et al. (2007). The authors of this article additionally developed an algorithm for assessing the activity of patients on social networks of the Internet. Reducing non-informative variables and conducting a confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 265 observations of schizophrenic patients (F20.0) aged from 18 to 55, recruited in four medical organizations (145 patients admitted to the hospital and 55 outpatients), resulted in determining a four-factor structure of the patients’ social network: «Objective parameters», «Internet activity», «Emotional aspect of social support» and

«Reciprocal support». The method has demonstrated high internal and external validity, as well as applicability in the clinical practice in schizophrenia due to the low resource consumption and compact applicability. Measurable factor indicators of the patients’ social networks obtained by using the structural assessment of the social network of schizophrenic patients allow to determine the targets for psychocorrectional interventions and to increase the effectiveness of psychosocial rehabilitation. In addition an automated method for calculating final indicators has been developed, as well as manual, practical recommendations and corresponding printed forms.

1. Gurovich I.J., Shmukler A.B. Praktikum po psihosocial’nomu lecheniju i psihosocial’noj reabilitacii psihicheski bol’nyh. Pod red. I.Ja. Gurovicha, A.B. Shmuklera.—(2-e izd.).— Moskva: Medpraktika-M. 2007:179

2. Egorov AY, Charnaya DI, Khutorianskaya YV, Pavlov AV, Grechanyi SV. Internet-dependent behavior in adolescents with mental disorders. Obozrenie Psihiatrii i Medicinskoj Psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2018; 4:35–45. (In Russ.) doi:10.31363/2313-7053-2018-4-35-45.

3. Maslovskiy SYu, Kozlovskiy VL. Evaluating quality of life of patients with schizophrenia during maintenance therapy. Obozrenie Psihiatrii i Medicinskoj Psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2009; 3:29-32. (in Russ.).

4. Trusova AV, Grechanyi SV, Soldatkin VA, Yakovlev AN, Ilyuk RD, Chuprova NA, et. al. Internet addiction predictors: analysis of psychological factors. Obozrenie Psihiatrii i Medicinskoj Psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2020; 1:72–82. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31363/2313-7053-2020-1-72-82

5. Bentgtsson-Tops A, Hannsson L. Quantitative and qualitative aspects of the social network in schizophrenic patients living in the community. Relationship to sociodemographic characteristics and clinical factors and subjective quality of life. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2001; 47(3):47–67. doi: 10.1177/002076400104700307

6. Birnbaum M, Rizvi A, Correll C, et al. Role of social media and the Internet in pathways to care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders and non-psychotic mood disorders. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017; 11(4):290–295. doi: 10.1111/eip.12237

7. Bjornestad J, Hegelstad WTV, Berg H, Davidson L, Joa I, Johannessen JO, Melle I, Stain HJ, Pallesen S. Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(6):e13957. doi: 10.2196/13957

8. Brusilovskiy E, Townley G, Snethen G, Salzer MS. Social media use, community participation and psychological well-being among individuals with serious mental illnesses. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 65:232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.036

9. Chronister J, Chou CC, Kwan KL, Lawton M, Silver K. The meaning of social support for persons with serious mental illness. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2015; 60(3):23–245. doi: 10.1037/rep0000038

10. Degnan A, Berry K, Sweet D, Abel K, Crossley N, Edge D. Social Networks and Symptomatic and Functional Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2018; 53:873–888. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1552-8

11. Firmin RL, Luther L, Lysaker PH, Salyers MP. Self-initiated helping behaviors and recovery in severe mental illness: Implications for work, volunteerism, and peer support. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2015; 38(4):336–341. doi: 10.1037/prj0000145

12. Gayer-Anderson C, Morgan C. Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2013; 22(2):131-146. doi: 10.1017/S2045796012000406

13. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2010;40(2):218–227. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8

14. Hendryx M, Green CA, Perrin NA. Social support, activities, and recovery from serious mental illness: STARS study findings. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2009; 36(3):320–329. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9151-1

15. Karanci NA, Gök AC, Yıldırım B, Borhan N. Social support perceptions of Turkish people with schizophrenia: What helps and what doesn’t help. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2017; 63(7):657–665. doi: 10.1177/0020764017726931

16. Kay S, Fiszbein A, Opler L. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulleten. 1987; 13(2):261–76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261

17. Miller BJ, Stewart A, Schrimsher J, Peeples D, Buckley PF. How connected are people with schizophrenia? Cell phone, computer, email, and social media use. Psychiatry Research. 2015; 225(3):458–463. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.067

18. Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, Ugolini S, Pioli R. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2000; 101(4):323–329.

19. Phillips SL. Network characteristics related to the well-being of normals: a comparative base. Schizophr Bull. 1981; 7(1):117–24. doi: 10.1093/schbul/7.1.117

20. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012; 48(2):1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02

21. Schreiber JB, Nora A., Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research. 2006; 99(6):323–338. doi: 10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

22. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Edited by: Scott J, Carrington PJ. London: SAGE Publications. 2014. doi: 10.4135/9781446294413

23. Stein CH, Aguirre R, Hunt MG. Social networks and personal loss among young adults with mental illness and their parents: A family perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2013; 36(1):15–21. doi: 10.1037/h0094742

24. Townsend L, Zippay A, Caler K, Forenza B. Technology and opportunity: people with serious mental illness and social connection. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. 2016; 7(2):371–393. doi: 10.1086/686882

25. Villagonzalo KA, Arnold C, Farhall J, Rossell SL, Foley F, Thomas N. Predictors of overall and mental health-related internet use in adults with psychosis. Psychiatry Research. 2019; 278:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.034

26. Walsh J, Connelly PR. Supportive behaviors in natural support networks of people with serious mental illness. Health & Social Work. 1996; 21(4):296–303. doi: 10.1093/hsw/21.4.296

27. Watabe T, Suzuki K. Internet communication of outpatients with Asperger’s disorder or schizophrenia in Japan. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. 2015; 7(1):27–35. doi: 10.1111/appy.12108

28. Watson AC, Corrigan P, Larson JE, Sells M. Selfstigma in people with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2007; 33(6):1312–1318. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl076