Psychological characteristics of women with problems of the facial skin: relationship with age, diagnosis, effectiveness of treatment
https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2021-56-3-62-72
Abstract
Summary. In order to study the correlation of clinical-biological and socio-psychological characteristics of women with cosmetological problems of the skin of the face using a complex of methods of clinical, clinical-psychological and psychometric diagnostics, 110 patients of the cosmetology clinic were studied and were divided into four diagnostic groups («Gravitational ptosis»,»Mimic wrinkles»,»Acne»,»Skin dehydration»). The average age of the sample was 35.64 ± 1.11 years. The specific objectives of the study were to study the relationship between age, clinical and psychological characteristics of patients; the effectiveness of cosmetological treatment and the psychological characteristics of the patients; the degree of influence of the cosmetological problem on the vital activity and psychological characteristics of the patients; attitude towards oneself and other psychological characteristics of women with facial skin defects.
Based on the analysis of special literature and the results of our own research, it is shown that it is necessary to study the relationship of psychological and clinical-biological factors for the individualization of the process of cosmetological correction of the facial skin.
A statistically significant relationship was established between age and clinical diagnosis, between age and psychological characteristics of patients. It has been proven that subjective satisfaction with the results of treatment positively correlates with extraversion and self-confidence, as well as with an objective assessment of the effectiveness of treatment, which in turn is interrelated with patient satisfaction with their social and professional status, as well as with the internal orientation of the personality - factors that contribute to compliance. and partnership in the treatment process.
It was revealed: the higher the severity of the facial skin defect, the more self-doubt, inability to cooperate and cooperate in the personality structure, and the lower the expert assessment of the effectiveness of treatment.
References
1. Alexandrov AA, Bagnenko ES. Psychological characteristics of females with face skin defects. Vestnik psikhoterapii. 2012; 41(46):52-66. (In Russ.).
2. Bagnenko ES. System of significant relations and personal motivational orientation of women with face skin defects. Obozrenie Psihiatrii i Medicinskoj Psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2012; 3:42-47. (In Russ.).
3. Bazhin Ye. F., Etkind A. M. Lichnostnyy differentsial: metodicheskiye rekomendatsii. L .: NIPNI im. V. M. Bekhtereva; 1983. (In Russ.).
4. Vasilyeva AV, Karavaeva TA. Psychosocial factors of the neurotic disorders treatment and prevention in metropolis. Obozrenie Psihiatrii i Medicinskoj Psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2020; 2:95-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2020-2-95-104
5. Vasserman L.I., Ababkov V.A., Trifonova Ye.A. Sovladaniye so stressom: teoriya i psikhodiagnostika. Uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye. SPb.: Rech’; 2010. (In Russ.).
6. Vasserman L.I., Berebin M.A., Iovlev B.V. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika urovnya so-tsial’noy frustrirovannosti. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika rasstroystv emotsio-nal’noy sfery lichnosti. Kollektivnaya monografiya. Nauch. red. L.I. Vasserman, O.YU. Shchelkova. SPb .: Skifiya-print. 2014; 187- 213. (In Russ.).
7. Изард К.Э. Психология эмоций: пер. с английского. СПб.: Питер; 2006. Izard Carroll E. The psychology of emotions. New York, London: Plenum Press; 1991
8. Karavaeva TA, Korolkova TN. Psychological mechanisms and psychosomatic relationships in various dermatoses. Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya. 2018; 17(5):7-17. (In Russ.). https: //doi.org/10.17116/klinderma2018170517
9. Kulikov L.V. Diagnostika dominiruyushchego sostoyaniya. Praktikum po psikhologii zdorov’ya. Pod obshchey red. G.S. Nikiforova. SPb.: Piter; 2005:44-60. (In Russ.).
10. Kulikov L.V. Emotsional’naya ustoychivost’ lichnosti. SPb.: Fakul’tet psikhologii SPbGU; 2008. (In Russ.).
11. Leont’yev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroyeniye i dinamika smyslovoy real’-nosti. 3-ye izdaniye. M .: Smysl; 2007. (In Russ.).
12. Leont’yev D.A. Test smyslozhiznennykh oriyentatsiy (SZHO). 2-ye izdaniye. M .: Smysl; 2006. (In Russ.).
13. Libina A. Psikhologiya sovremennoy zhenshchiny. M .: Eksmo; 2003. (In Russ.).
14. Neznanov NG, Vasilieva AV. Possibilities of the psychodynamic approach in the multidimesional model of the etiopathogenesis of dermatological diseases. Psikhiatricheskiye rasstroystva v obshchey meditsine. 2015; 4:16-21. (In Russ.).
15. Pervin L., Dzhon O. Psikhologiya lichnosti: teoriya i issledovaniya. Perevod s angliy-skogo. M .: Aspekt-Press; 2001. (In Russ.).
16. Rubinshteyn S.YA. Eksperimental’nyye metodiki patopsikhologii i opyt primeneniya ikh v klinike: prakticheskoye rukovodstvo. M .: EKSMO-Press; 1999. (In Russ.).
17. Svyatenko L.V. Psikhologicheskiye faktory rasstroystv adaptatsii zhenshchin s izbytoch-nym vesom. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk. SPb .; 2012. (In Russ.).
18. Slastenina VV. Social-psychological characteristics of the women resorting to services of aesthetic surgery. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2007; 303:205-208. (In Russ.).
19. Tkhostov A.SH. Psikhologiya telesnosti. M .: Smysl; 2002. (In Russ.).
20. Yanichev D.P. Kognitivnyye aspekty samovospriyatiya lichnostnykh chert u patsiyentov s nevroticheskoy i nevrozopodobnoy simptomatikoy: Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Spb.; 2006. (In Russ.).
21. Balkrishnan R, McMichael A, Hu J, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes. Int. J. Dermatol. 2006; 45(2):111-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02371.x.
22. Carrard I, Argyrides M, Ioannou X, et al. Associations between body dissatisfaction, importance of appearance, and aging anxiety with depression, and appearance-related behaviors in women in mid-life. J Women Aging. 2019; 33(1):70-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2019.1681882
23. Cook SA. The psychological and social characteristics of patients referred for NHS cosmetic surgery: quantifying clinical need. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59(1):54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.08.004.
24. Hashim PW, Nia JK, Taliercio M, Goldenberg G. Ideals of facial beauty. Cutis. 2017; 100(4):222-224.
25. Hong J, Koo B, Koo J. The psychosocial and occupational impact of chronic skin disease. Dermatol Ther. 2008; 21(1):54-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00170.x.
26. Muhlan H, Eisenmann-Klein M, Schmidt S. Psychological features in a german sample of female cosmetic surgery candidates. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007; 31(6):746-751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0211-8.
27. Rankin M., Borah GL, Perry AW. Quality-of-life outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998; 102(3): 2139-2145.
28. Rumsey N, Harcourt D. The Psychology of Appearance. McGraw-Hill. Open University Press. 2005.
29. Sadick NS. The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life. Dermatol Online J. 2008; 14(8):2.
30. Sarwer DB. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments. Body Image. 2019; 31:302-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009.
31. Von Soest T, Kvalem I, Roald H, Skolleborg K. The effects of cosmetic surgery on body image, self-esteem, and psychological problems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62(10):1238-1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.12.093.
Review
For citations:
Bagnenko E.S. Psychological characteristics of women with problems of the facial skin: relationship with age, diagnosis, effectiveness of treatment. V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2021;55(3):62-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2021-56-3-62-72