The internet factor in the context of prevention and treatment of covid-19. To the problem statement

The article notes that the Western model of civilization based on the cult of individual legal freedom, including a clear and optimistic picture of the future developing according to the laws of liberal progress based on this cult, has been significantly shaken in recent years due to the post-informational stage of development of society, and especially with the advent of the Internet. These factors contributed to the strengthening of distressing influences in society, leading to anxious expectations of the population as a reaction to the redundancy of the uncontrolled flow of information and, as a consequence, to the growth in the 21st century of the massive demand for global security. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, biopolitical projects of total security have entered into the sphere of practical politics, with Western society failing to consider the issue of public security vs. human rights in an analytically impartial and critically free capacity as scientists, including specialists in the field of public health, did 10-15 years ago. The situation that has arisen reinforces the negative socio-psychological tendencies noted above. This circumstance makes it necessary to consider the situation of a pandemic from the point of view of the special role of its network information support and the nature of organizational and methodological measures aimed at combating disease.
The article examines the socially destructive and socio-psychopathological aspects of the network era, fraught with the threat of the development of mass psychosis, which was most clearly manifested in the situation of a pandemic, regardless of the specific ideological attitudes of a particular social group. The network factor and organizational and methodological measures aimed at combating the coronavirus are analyzed in detail. It is concluded that it is necessary to correct the non-optimal trends that were revealed at the height of the network era both in public sentiment and in the actions of the authorities, in terms of a more effective fight against the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. To this end, it is proposed to take into account the laws of the network era and be actively present in the Internet space, creating from within an informational counterbalance to the observed negative trends. Specific directions in the implementation of this work are listed.

1. Агамбен Дж. QR-код. [centerforpoliticsanalysis. ru]. Centerforpoliticsanalysis; 2021. Доступно: https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/qr-kod;

2. Агамбен Дж. Граждане второго сорта. [centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru]. Centerforpoliticsanalysis. 2021. Доступно: https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/grazhdane-vtorogo-sorta;

3. Агамбен Дж. Два имени. [centerforpoliticsanalysis. ru]. Centerforpoliticsanalysis. 2021. Доступно: https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/dva-imeni

4. Агамбен Дж. Реквием по студентам [centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru]. Centerforpoliticsanalysis; 2021. Доступно: https:// centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/rekviem-po-studentam;

5. Барабанов Б. Рок против обязаловки. Эрик Клэптон пополнил ряды COVID-диссидентов. Коммерсантъ. [kommersant.ru]. Kommersan. 2021. Доступно: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4917924

6. Бехтерев В.М. Внушение и его роль в общественной жизни. По изд.: М. 1925. [yurpsy.com]. Yurpsy; 2021. Доступно: http://yurpsy.com/files/biblio/behter/behter.htm

7. Вид В.Д. Психотерапия шизофрении — 3-е изд. — СПб: Питер. 2008. Vid V.D. Psihoterapiya shizofrenii — 3- e izd. — SPb: Piter. 2008. (In Russ.).

8. Габриадзе Р., Данелия Г. Сценарий фильма «КИН — ДЗА — ДЗА». [litmir.me]. Litmir. 2012. Доступно: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=130861&p=1

9. Грановская Р.М., Никольская И.М. Защита личности: психологические механизмы — СПб: Знание. 1999. Granovskaya R.M., Nikol’skaya I.M. Zashchita lichnosti: psihologicheskie mekhanizmy — SPb: Znanie. 1999. (In Russ.).

10. Evdokimova VA. System distortion of information in the post-information society. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2015;1(19):120-127. (In Russ.).

11. Kotsyubinsky A.P. Mnogomernaya (holisticheskaya) diagnostika v psihiatrii (biologicheskij, psihologicheskij, social’nyj i funkcional’nyj diagnozy). SPb: SpecLit 2017. (In Russ.).

12. Kotsyubinsky AP, Kotsyubinsky DA. Mental health of society. Part 1. Nezavisimyj psihiatricheskij zhurnal. 2018;4:10-17. (In Russ.).

13. Коцюбинский Д.А. Свободный и надёжный региональный дом как глобальная цель XXI века. Фонд Либеральная миссия. [liberal.ru]. Liberal. 2020. Доступно: https://liberal.ru/globalization/svobodnyi-i-nadejnyi-regionalnyi-dom-kak-globalnayacel-xxi-veka

14. Kotsyubinsky D.A., Malinin Yu.P. Fenomen kapitalizma i problema ego stanovleniya. Social’nopoliticheskie problemy v istorii zarubezhnyh stran. Mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskij universitet, 1994. (In Russ.).

15. Крусе Я.Э. NRK (Норвегия): россияне говорят вакцинам нет из укоренившегося недоверия властям // ИноСМИ. 07.07.2021.

16. Neznanov NG, Kotsyubinsky AP, Kotsyubinsky DA. Crisis of natural-scientific and human approaches in psychiatry. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva. 2019;1:8-15. (In Russ.).

17. Panchenko AA. «The beast computer of brussels»: apocalyptic imagination and conspiracy theories in present day religious culture. Antropologicheskij forum. 2015;27:122-141. (In Russ.).

18. Петров А. Почему в Волгограде не могут остановить эпидемию коронавируса? Отвечают учёные и микробиологи. Уже не секрет, что вирус становится всё опаснее, заразнее и переносится тяжелее, чем раньше. [v1.ru]. V1; 2021. Доступно: https://v1.ru/text/health/2021/10/08/70179998/

19. Popov VS. Superstitions in the modern social environment (on the example of the Internet). Analitika kul’turologii. 2011;2(20):217-219. (In Russ.).

20. Сманцер В. «Руки прочь от наших прав!». Как карантин в Европе привел к массовым беспорядкам. [Lenta.ru]. Lenta. 2021. Доступно: https://lenta.ru/articles/2021/09/06/antikovid_eu/?from=RCM-F6FE

21. Сотирис Панайотис. Против Агамбена: Возможна ли демократическая биополитика? [centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru]. Centerforpoliticsanalysis; 2020. Доступно: https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/protiv-agambena-vozmozhna-li-demokraticheskaja-biopolitika

22. Тороева Д. Народ против Агамбена: что превратило модного философа в опасного фрика? [gorod-812.ru]. Gorod-812; 2021. Доступно: https://gorod-812.ru/narod-protivagambena-chto-prevratilo-modnogo-filosofa-vopasnogo-frika/

23. Fadeeva LA. Discussions on intellectuals in the context of the western political history. Dialog so vremenem. 2012;41:108-138. (In Russ.).

24. Фигурина И. Биолог о четвертой волне COVID-19, которая уже началась: «Ее сценарий гораздо хуже, чем предыдущий». Почему врачи и учёные начали бить тревогу. [NGS. ru]. Ngs; 2021. Доступно: https://ngs.ru/text/health/2021/09/15/70136171/

25. Филимонов В. Мир готовят к поголовной чипизации через вакцинацию. [ruskline.ru]. Ruskline; 2020. Доступно: https://ruskline.ru/news_rl/2020/03/20/mir_gotovyat_k_pogolovnoi_chipizacii_cherez_vakcinaciyu

26. Frejd A. Psihologiya «Ya» i zashchitnye mekhanizmy6 per. s angl. M.: Pedagogika-Press. 1993. (In Russ.).

27. Khokhlov AA. Conspiracy theories as a phenomenon of media impact on public consciousness. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie». 2020;2(21):94–102. (In Russ.).

28. Shahnovich M.M. Antichnaya filosofiya religii i paradoksy antichnogo ateizma. Al’manah «Akaδhmeia». Materialy i issledovaniya po istorii platonizma. Vypusk 3. SPb: Izdatel›stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2000. (In Russ.).

29. Шварцман В. Англия — новый лидер по числу заражений коронавирусом в мире. Почему власти снимают все ограничения в разгар пандемии? [Lenta.ru]. Lenta.ru; 2021. Доступно: https://lenta.ru/articles/2021/07/19/uk_third_wave/

30. Iudalevich NV. Information garbage as phenomenon of modern society. Biznes-obrazovanie v ekonomike znanij. 2016;2:119-122. (In Russ.).

31. Юшков М. Дуров в день рождения составил список недооцененных и переоцененных вещей. [rbc.ru]. Rbc; 2021. Доступно: https://www.rbc.ru/society/10/10/2021/61633e049a7947f3d64b9a65

32. Annas George J. Your liberty or your life. Talking Point on public health versus civil liberties. EMBO Rep. 2007;8(12):1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401133

33. Christaens Tim. Must Society be Defended from Agamben? [criticallegalthinking.com]. Criticallegalthinking; 2020. Available: https://criticallegalthinking.com/2020/03/26/mustsociety-be-defended-from-agamben/

34. Hearst Fiona. Does New Zealand need to rethink its Covid -19 strategy? [rte.ie]. Rte; 2021. Available: https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/0828/1243124-new-zealand-covid-elimination-strategy/

35. Heartfield James. The Covid surveillance state is no model for the future. Benjamin Bratton’s Revenge of the Real argues for a kinder, gentler authoritarianism. [spiked-online.com] Spikedonline; 2021. Available: https://www.spiked-online.com/2021/08/31/the-covid-surveillance-state-is-no-model-forthe-future/

36. Humphreys Joe. The left’s lockdown critique: Right on, or dangerous prattle? Unthinkable: Philosopher Giorgio Agamben carries the flame for anticapitalism through the crisis. [irishtimes.com]. Irishtimes; 2021. Available: https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/theleft-s-lockdown-critique-right-on-or-dangerousprattle-1.4458352; https://criticallegalthinking.com/2020/03/26/must-society-be-defended-fromagamben/;

37. Kranz Lewis Katherine. The pandemic threat: are we prepared?. Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum). 2006;29:1-14.

38. The French general population’s attitudes toward lockdown against COVID-19: a fragile consensus. [bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com]. Bmcpublichealth; 2020. Available: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-020-10048-1

39. Zachary J Goldberg, Sean Richey. Anti-vaccination beliefs and unrelated conspiracy theorie. World Affairs. [researchgate.net]. Esearchgate; 2020. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346682366_Anti-Vaccination_Beliefs_And_Unrelated_Conspiracy_Theories