High-risk state for psychosis: psychometric screening tools
https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2024-832
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to highlight current ideas available in the world literature about high-risk state for psychosis as a promising diagnostic stage for identification risk groups for the development of schizophrenia in the near future, as well as to allocate and characterize the tools for screening the highrisk state for psychosis.
Identification and timely correction of risk factors is a relevant method for reducing the incidence of schizophrenia and improving the prognosis of the disease.
As a result of the literature data analysis with a summary of the available results of original researches, systematic reviews and meta-analyses the data about currently available approaches to unified standardized diagnostics of high-risk state for psychosis are presented, and their comparative characteristic is carried out.
According to the review of publications, none of the currently available tools fully covers all contemporary diagnostic approaches, and therefore, in order to achieve an optimal result in identifying a state of high risk of psychosis, the combined use of various tools seems to be the most reliable. In addition, the further development of available screening tools and their validation in the Russian population remains relevant.
About the Authors
I. E. Tsarkov
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan E. Tsarkov
Nizhny Novgorod
A. E. Novoselova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia E. Novoselova
Nizhny Novgorod
T. V. Zhilyaeva
Privolzhsky Research Medical University; V.M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Zhilyaeva
Nizhny Novgorod; St. Petersburg
G. E. Mazo
V.M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina E. Mazo
St. Petersburg
References
1. Kaleda VG, Omelchenko MA. The Clinical Course and Prognostic Problems of Youth Depressions with Attenuated Schizophrenic Symptoms. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva. 2021;55(1):42-52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2021-1-42-52
2. Omelchenko MA. Clinical High Risk Psychosis: Issues of Diagnostics and Therapy. Psikhiatriya. 2020;18(2):82-91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30629/2618-6667-2020-18-2-8291
3. Omelchenko MA, Kaleda VG. Attenuated negative symptoms in the structure of youth depression. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2023;123(2):90-96. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202312302190.
4. Omelchenko MA, Migalina VV. Clinical-correlative analysis of patients at risk of schizophrenia. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva. 2022;56(4):85-91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2022-4-85-91.
5. Skugarevskaya MM. Predictors of Psychosis at the Prodromal Stage of Schizophrenia. Psihiatriya, psihoterapiya i klinicheskaya psihologiya. 2019;10(3):428-438. (In Russ.).
6. Skugarevskaya MM. The risk syndrome for first psychosis: neuropsychological aspects of the disorder progression. Psyhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2013;1– 2:84-89. (In Russ.).
7. Addington J et al. Youth at-risk for serious mental illness: Methods of the PROCAN study. BMC psychiatry. 2018;18(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1801-0.
8. Andreou C, Bailey B, Borgwardt S. Assessment and treatment of individuals at high risk for psychosis. B.J. Psych. Advances. 2019;25(3):177–184. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2019.3
9. Bourgin J, Duchesnay E, Magaud E, Gaillard R, Kazes M, Krebs MO. Predicting the individual risk of psychosis conversion in at-risk mental state (ARMS): a multivariate model reveals the influence of nonpsychotic prodromal symptoms. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;29(11):15251535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01461-y.
10. Chan V. Schizophrenia and psychosis: diagnosis, current research trends, and model treatment approaches with implications for transitional age youth. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics. 2017;26(2):341-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2016.12.014.
11. Chee TT, Chua L, Morrin H, Lim MF, Fam J, Ho R. Neuroanatomy of Patients with Deficit Schizophrenia: An Exploratory Quantitative MetaAnalysis of Structural Neuroimaging Studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(17):6227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176227
12. Daneault JG, Stip E, Refer-O-Scope Group. Genealogy of instruments for prodrome evaluation of psychosis. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2013;4:25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00025
13. Fusar-Poli P, Cappucciati M, De Micheli A, Rutigliano G, Bonoldi I, Tognin S, Ramella-Cravaro V, Castagnini A, McGuire P. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS) in individuals at ultra high risk. Schizophr. Bull. 2017;43:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw151
14. Fusar-Poli P, Cappucciati M, Rutigliano G, Lee TY, Beverly Q, Bonoldi I, Lelli J, Kaar SJ, Gago E, Rocchetti M, Patel R, Bhavsar V, Tognin S, Badger S, Calem M, Lim K, Kwon JS, Perez J, McGuire P. Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS. Psychiatry Journal. 2016;2016:7146341. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7146341
15. Fusar-Poli P. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of DSM-5 attenuated psychosis syndrome in services for individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2018;44(2):264-275. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx055
16. Fusar-Poli P. et al. Improving the detection of individuals at clinical risk for psychosis in the community, primary and secondary care: an integrated evidence-based approach. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2019;10:774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00774
17. Fusar-Poli P. The Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis (CHR-P), Version II. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2017;43(1):44–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw158
18. Gross G., Huber G., Klosterkotter J., Linz J. Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms — BSABS. Berlin: Springer. 1987.
19. Hengartner MP, Heekeren K, Dvorsky D, Walitza S, Rössler W, Theodoridou A. Checking the predictive accuracy of basic symptoms against ultra high-risk criteria and testing of a multivariable prediction model: Evidence from a prospective three-year observational study of persons at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;45:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.026
20. Klosterkotter J, Schultze-Lutter F, Bechdolf A, Ruhrmann S. Prediction and prevention of schizophrenia: what has been achieved and where to go next? World Psychiat. 2011;10:165–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00044.x
21. Maurer K, Häfner H. Rasch scaling of a screening instrument: assessing proximity to psychosis onset by the ERIraos Checklist. Sage open. 2014;4(3):2158244014545326.
22. McGorry PD et al. Beyond the “at risk mental state” concept: transitioning to transdiagnostic psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(2):133-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20514
23. McGorry PD et al. EPPIC: an evolving system of early detection and optimal management. Schizophrenia bulletin. 1996;22(2):305-326. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/22.2.305
24. McGorry PD, Mei C. Ultra-high-risk paradigm: lessons learnt and new directions. BMJ Ment Health. 2018;21(4):131-133. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2018-300061
25. Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Woods SW, Stein K, Driesen N, Corcoran CM, Hoffman R, Davidson L. Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states. Psychiatr Q. 1999;70(4):273-87. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022034115078
26. Pelizza L et al. The approved Italian version of the comprehensive assessment of at‐risk mental states (CAARMS‐ITA): Field test and psychometric features. Early intervention in psychiatry. 2019;13(4):810-817. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12669
27. Savill M et al. Psychosis risk screening in different populations using the Prodromal Questionnaire: A systematic review. Early intervention in psychiatry. 2018;12(1):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12446
28. Schultze-Lutter F, Theodoridou A. The concept of basic symptoms: its scientific and clinical relevance. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):104–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20404
29. Schultze-Lutter F, Wieneke A, Picker H, Rolff Y, Steinmeyer EM, Ruhrmann S et al. The schizophrenia prediction instrument, adult version (SPI-A). Schizophr. Res. 2004;70(1):76-77.
30. Seidman L & Mirsky A. Evolving Notions of Schizophrenia as a Developmental Neurocognitive Disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2017;23(9-10):881-892. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617717001114
31. Shah JL, Crawford A, Mustafa SS, Iyer SN, Joober R, Malla AK. Is the Clinical High-Risk State a Valid Concept? Retrospective Examination in a First-Episode Psychosis Sample. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(10):1046-1052. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600304
32. Sommer IE et al. Early interventions in risk groups for schizophrenia: what are we waiting for?. npj Schizophrenia. 2016:2(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjschz.2016.3
33. Thompson A, Marwaha S, Broome MR. At-risk mental state for psychosis: identification and current treatment approaches. BJPsych Advances. 2016;22(3):186-193. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.115.015487
34. Woods SW et al. The case for including Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms Syndrome in DSM-5 as a psychosis risk syndrome. Schizophrenia research. 2010;123(2-3):199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.012
35. Worthington MA, Cao H, Cannon TD. Discovery and validation of prediction algorithms for psychosis in youths at clinical high risk. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. 2020;5(8):738-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.006
36. Yung AR et al. Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia bulletin.1996;22(2):283-303. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/22.2.283
37. Zarogianni E et al. Individualized prediction of psychosis in subjects with an at-risk mental state. Schizophrenia research. 2019; 214:18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.061
38. Zhang TH et al. Prediction of psychosis in prodrome: development and validation of a simple, personalized risk calculator. Psychological medicine. 2019;49(12):1990-1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718002738
Review
For citations:
Tsarkov I.E., Novoselova A.E., Zhilyaeva T.V., Mazo G.E. High-risk state for psychosis: psychometric screening tools. V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2024;58(2):20-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2024-832
Views:
603
Email this article 