Вызванная кортикальная электрическая активность, связанная с предъявлением готового решения задачи на отдаленные ассоциации

Цель настоящей работы состояла в том, чтобы выяснить, какие из отделов коры, обычно активируемых при решении инсайтных задач, являются источниками вызванной активности в условиях индуцированного инсайта—инсайта, вызванного предъявлением готового решения задачи. В эксперименте приняли участие 35 взрослых испытуемых. В ходе эксперимента испытуемые пытались найти слово, с помощью которого можно образовать словосочетание с тремя зрительно предъявленными заданными словами,—решали задачи на поиск отдаленных ассоциаций (CRA). Записывалось ЭЭГ высокой плотности (128 каналов) при помощи компьютерного электроэнцефалографа (Geodesic EEG System GES 400 Series). Приведены результаты анализа вызванной предъявлением слова-подсказки кортикальной активности в выбранных областях интереса. Полученные результаты находятся в согласии с имеющимися представлениями о функциях отделов коры, задействованных в решении задач. Обсуждается вопрос об усовершенствовании методики эксперимента.

1. Ansburg PI, Hill K. Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;34(7):1141-1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00104-6

2. Bartolomé G, Vila S, Torrelles-Nadal C, Blanco E. Right Cortical Activation During Generation of Creative Insights: An Electroencephalographic Study of Coaching. Frontiers in Education. 2022;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.753710

3. Bowden EM Et al. New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2005;9(7):322-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.012

4. Bowden EM, Jung-Beeman M. Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods. 2007;42(1):87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007.

5. Bowden EM, Jung-Beeman M. Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers. 2003;35:634-639. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195543

6. Chen J, Zhang K, Du X, Pan J, Luo J. The Neural Mechanisms of the Effect of Spontaneous Insight on Re-Solution: An ERP Study. J Intell. 2023;11(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010010

7. Cranford EA, Moss J. Is insight always the same? A protocol analysis of insight in compound remote associate problems. The Journal of Problem Solving. 2012;4(2):8. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1129

8. Danek AH, Flanagin VL. Cognitive conflict and restructuring: The neural basis of two core components of insight. AIMS Neurosci. 2019;6(2):60-84. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.2.60

9. Danek AH, Wiley J. What about False Insights? Deconstructing the Aha! Experience along Its Multiple Dimensions for Correct and Incorrect Solutions Separately. Front Psychol. 2017;7:2077. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02077.

10. Duncker K. On problem-solving. Psychological monographs. 1945;58(5): i113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599

11. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, Zilles K. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage. 2005;25(4):1325-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034

12. Fleck I, Jessica I, Robert W Weisberg. «The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem.» Memory & cognition 2004;32: 990-1006. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196876

13. Jung-Beeman M, Bowden EM, Haberman J, Frymiare JL, Arambel-Liu S, Greenblatt R, Reber PJ, Kounios J. Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PloS Biol. 2004;2(4):E97. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020097

14. Kershaw TC, Ohlsson S. Multiple Causes of Difficulty in Insight: The Case of the Nine-Dot Problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2004;30(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.3

15. Kizilirmak JM, Thuerich H, Folta-Schoofs K, Schott BH, Richardson-Klavehn A. Neural Correlates of Learning from Induced Insight: A Case for Reward-Based Episodic Encoding. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01693

16. Knyazev GG; Ushakov VL; Orlov VA; Malakhov DG; Kartashov SI; Savostyanov AN; Bocharov AV; Velichkovsky BM. EEG and fMRI Correlates of Insight: A Pilot Study. Symmetry. 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13020330

17. Kounios J, Beeman M. The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:71-93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154

18. Lee CS, Therriault DJ. The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence. 2013;41(5):306-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008

19. Luo J, Li W, Fink A, Jia L, Xiao X, Qiu J, Zhang Q. The time course of breaking mental sets and forming novel associations in insight-like problem solving: an ERP investigation. Exp Brain Res. 2011;212(4):583-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2761-5

20. Luo J, Niki K, Phillips S. The function of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in the insightful solving of puzzles: The ACC is activated less when the structure of the puzzle is known. J Psychol Chin Soc. 2004;5:195–213

21. Lytaev S. Long-Latency Event-Related Potentials (300-1000 ms) of the Visual Insight. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(4):13-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041323

22. Maier NRF. Reasoning in humans. I. On direction. Journal of comparative Psychology. 1930;10(2):115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073232

23. Maier NRF. Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 1931;12(2):181-194. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071361

24. Mednick MT, Halpern S. Remote associates test. Psychological Review. 1968;2(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1968.tb00104.x

25. Metcalfe J. Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1986;12(4):623–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393

26. Oh Y, Chesebrough C, Erickson B, Zhang F, Kounios J. An insight-related neural reward signal. Neuroimage. 2020;214:116757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116757

27. Ohlsson S. Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. Advances in the psychology of thinking. 1992;1:1-44.

28. Ohlsson, S. Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 1984;25(2):117-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1984.tb01005.x

29. Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Koukkou M, Kochi K, Anderer P, Saletu B, Tanaka H, Hirata K, John ER, Prichep L, Biscay-Lirio R, Kinoshita T. Assessing interactions in the brain with exact lowresolution electromagnetic tomography. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011;13;369(1952):3768-84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0081

30. Rowe G, Hirsh JB, Anderson AK. Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(1):383-388. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605198104

31. Salvi C et al. Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2015;22:1814-1819. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0

32. Salvi C, Beeman M, Bikson M, McKinley R, Grafman J. TDCS to the right anterior temporal lobe facilitates insight problem-solving. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57724-1

33. Salvi C, Bricolo E, Kounios J, Bowden E, Beeman M. Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Think Reason. 2016;22(4):443-460. https://10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798

34. Shen W, Tong Y, Li F, Yuan Y, Hommel B, Liu C, Luo J. Tracking the neurodynamics of insight: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Biol Psychol. 2018;138:189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.018

35. Sheth BR, Sandkühler S, Bhattacharya J. Posterior Beta and anterior gamma oscillations predict cognitive insight. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(7):1269-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21069

36. Subramaniam K, Kounios J, Parrish TB, JungBeeman M. A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(3):415-32. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21057

37. Vohs KD, Heatherton TF. Self-esteem and threats to self: Implications for self-construals and interpersonal perceptions. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2001;81(6):1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1103

38. Wertheimer M., Wertheimer M. Productive thinking. New York: Harper; 1959.