Psychological adaptation and quality of life of patients who underwent lower limb amputation due to cancer

Patients who face a stressful situation related to cancer and loss of a limb have not been thoroughly studied form a psychological perspective, what limits the possibilities of targeted psychological assistance and social rehabilitation. In this regard, the aim of the research was to study the clinical and psychological status, strategies and personal resources for coping with the stress of the disease, as well as the main parameters of the quality of life (QoL) of patients who underwent lower limb amputation due to cancer (group 1, n = 24, men — 62.5%, average age 47.25 ± 3.17), in comparison with patients amputated due to other somatic diseases not accompanied by an actual vital threat (group 2, n = 15, men — 93.3%, average age 59.67 ± 2.27), as well as with normative psychodiagnostic data. Methods of clinical and psychological diagnostics were used, including “Ways of Coping Questionnaire”, “Big V Questionnaire”, “Purpose in Life Test”, EORTC “Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Questionnaire” (QLQ-C30). It was found that functional capability (p<0.01), objective (p<0.001) and subjective (p<0.001) severity of pain syndrome, as well as employment (p=0.05) have the lowest indicators in group 1 compared with group 2; at the same time, the levels of QoL in both groups of patients do not differ and do not correspond the expert assessment, exceeding it; patients rate their cognitive and emotional activity most highly; the lowest, physical and role activity, and financial impact. In the structure of coping of group 1, the strategy “Seeking for social support” predominates; the values of the scales “Distancing” (p=0.05), “Escape–avoidance” (0.1<p<0.05), “Positive reappraisal” (p<0.05) are higher than in group 2, but lower than average normative values. In the personality of patients in group 1, “Conscientiousness” (p=0.01) and “Openness” (0.1<p<0.05) prevail in comparison with patients in group 2, as well as “Extraversion” (0.1<p<0.05), “Conscientiousness” (p<0.001) and “Emotional stability / Neuroticism” (p<0.05) — compared with the mean values of the test. The indicators of the scales “Meaning of life” (p<0.01), “Fullness of life” (p<0.01), “Life satisfaction” (p<0.01) in group 1 are higher than in group 2; patients’ internality is higher than in the control sample of men (0.1<p<0.05) and women (p<0.01). The results obtained can be used in the process of rehabilitation of orthopedic cancer patients.

1. Aliev MD, Dolgushin BI, Demidov LV et al. The experience of using the technique of isolated regional chemotherapeutic limb perfusion. Povolzhskii onkologicheskii vestnik. 2012;2:35–44. (In Russ.).

2. Aliev MD, Sushentsov EA. Oncoorthopedics today. Sarkomy kostei, myagkikh tkanei i opukholi kozhi. 2012;4:3–10. (In Russ.).

3. Belozer AS, Dorodeykov VV, Petrova NN. Influence of affective and neurocognitive disorders on the quality of life in patients with ovarian cancer. Uchenye zapiski un-ta im. P.F. Lesgafta. 2019;5(171):410–418. (In Russ.).

4. Berebin M.A., Vasserman L.I. Sistemnyj podhod i teoriya funkcional’nyh sistem v izuchenii psihicheskoj adaptacii kak mediko-psihologicheskoj problemy. V kn.: Medicinskaya psihologiya v prakticheskom zdravoohranenii. SPb.: Izd. dom SPbMAPO. 2003:29–34. (In Russ.).

5. Berezin F.B. Psikhicheskaya i psikhofiziologicheskaya adaptatsiya cheloveka. L.: Nauka. 1988. (In Russ.).

6. Vasserman L.I., Ababkov V.A., Trifonova E.A. Psychological diagnosis of stress coping behavior. V kn.: Psihologicheskaya diagnostika sovladayushchego so stressom povedeniya. V kn.: Psihologicheskaya diagnostika rasstrojstv emocional’noj sfery i lichnosti. Kollekt. monogr. Nauch. red. L.I. Vasserman, O.Yu. Shchelkova. SPb.: Skifiya-print. 2014:323–345. (In Russ.).

7. Vasserman L.I., Trifonova E.A. Metodologiya issledovaniya svyazannogo so zdorov’em kachestva zhizni. V kn.: Psihologicheskaya diagnostika rasstrojstv emocional’noj sfery i lichnosti. Kollekt. monogr. Nauch. red. L.I. Vasserman, O.Yu. Shchelkova. SPb.: Skifiya-print. 2014: 30–43. (In Russ.)

8. Iovlev B.V., Karpova E.B. Psikhologiya otnoshenii. Kontseptsiya V.N. Myasishcheva i meditsinskaya psikhologiya. SPb.: Sensor. 1999. (In Russ.).

9. Karavaeva T.A. Stressovye i adaptatsionnye rasstroistva, razvivayushchiesya v svyazi s onkologicheskimi zabolevaniyami. V kn.: Onkopsikhologiya dlya vrachei i meditsinskikh psikhologov. Rukovodstvo. Red. A.M. Belyaev, V.A. Chulkova, T.Yu. Semiglazova, M.V. Rogachev. SPb.: Izdvo ANO «Voprosy onkologii». 2018:218–226. (In Russ.).

10. Karvasarskiy BD, Nazyrov RK, Podsadnyy SA et al. Medical psychology and rehabilitation: history and modernity. Psikhosotsial’naya reabilitatsiya i kachestvo zhizni. 2001;137:203–210. (In Russ.).

11. Kotsyubinskiy AP. Biopsychosocial model of schizophrenia. Psikhosotsial’naya reabilitatsiya i kachestvo zhizni. 2001;137:230–241. (In Russ.).

12. Leont’ev D.A. Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsii (SZhO). 2-e izd Moscow: Smysl. 2006. (In Russ.).

13. Mikhaylichenko TG, Shchelkova OYu. Methodology of studying psychological adaptation of patients with autoimmune liver diseases while waiting for transplantation. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gos. un-ta. Seriya «Psikhologiya». 2017;10(1):121–138. (In Russ.). doi:10.14529/psy170112

14. Pervin L., John O. Psihologiya lichnosti: teoriya i issledovaniya. per. s angl. M.: Aspekt-Press. 2001. (In Russ.).

15. Pestereva EV, Chulkova VA, Karitskiy AP et al. To the study of the quality of life of cancer patients. Voprosy onkologii. 2012;36(3):217–223. (In Russ.).

16. Petrova N.N. Somatogenic vital threat and adaptation. V kn.: Aktual’nye problemy klinicheskoi psikhologii i psikhofiziologii. Materialy nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii «Anan’evskie chteniya — 2004». SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU; 2004:238–253. (In Russ.).

17. Sirota N.A., Moskovchenko D.V., Yaltonskiy V.M., et al. Concern about the progression of cancer: modern theoretical concepts and approaches. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii: elektron. nauch. zhurn. [mprj.ru]. MPRJ; 2016;6(41). [accessed 15november 2021]. Available: http://mprj.ru/archiv_global/2016_6_41/nomer03.php (In Russ.).

18. Usmanova EB, Shchelkova OYu, Kulaga AV et al. Research of quality of life in oncoorthopedic clinic. Sarkomy kostei, myagkikh tkanei i opukholi kozhi. 2019;11(4):31–35. (In Russ.).

19. Usmanova E.B., Shchelkova O.Yu., Iakovleva M.V. ssledovanie kachestva zhizni bol’nykh s onkologicheskim porazheniem nizhnikh konechnostei pri raznykh vidakh khirurgicheskogo lecheniya. V kn.: Problemy teorii i praktiki sovremennoi psikhologii. Materialy XX Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Irkutsk, 23–24 aprelya 2021 g. Irkutsk: Irkutskiy gos. un-t. 2021:270–273. (In Russ.).

20. Shval’b PG, Kalinin PE, Suchkov IA et al. Causes of secondary amputations in patients with chronic critical ischemia of the lower extremities after reconstructive surgery. Novosti khirurgii. 2010;18(1):41– 45. (In Russ.).

21. Shchelkova O.Yu. Sistemnyi podkhod v meditsinskoi psikhologii. V kn.: Psikhodiagnostika i psikhokorrektsiya. Pod red. A.A. Aleksandrova. SPb.: Piter. 2008:84–114. (In Russ.).

22. Shchelkova OYu, Isurina GL, Usmanova EB et al. Disease-related stress coping and quality of life in patients with surgically treated spinal tumors. Mediko-biologicheskie i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy bezopasnosti v chrezvychainykh situatsiyakh. 2021;1:97–106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25016/2541-7487-2021-0-1-97-106.

23. Shchelkova OYu, Usmanova EB, Gorbunov IA et al. Psychological adjustment and quality of life in patients with bone tumor. Uchenye zapiski Sankt- Peterburgskogo gos. medits. un-ta im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2018;25(3):62–72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2018-25-3-62-72.

24. Shchelkova OYu, Iakovleva MV, Usmanova EB et al. The development of quality of life psychosocial model in cancer patients after lower limb amputation. Voprosy onkologii. 2021;67(4):559–568. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2021-67-4-559-568.

25. Yanichev D.P. Kognitivnye aspekty samovospriyatiya lichnostnykh chert u patsientov s nevroticheskoi i nevrozopodobnoi simptomatikoi. Avtoref. … kaand.psikhol.nauk. SPb. 2006. (In Russ.).

26. Balk EM, Gazula A, Markozannes G, et al. Psychometric Properties of Functional, Ambulatory, and Quality of Life Instruments in Lower Limb Amputees: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(12):2354–2370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.015.

27. Davie-Smith F, Paul L, Stuart W et al. The influence of socio-economic deprivation on mobility, participation, and quality of life following major lower extremity amputation in the West of Scotland. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(4):554–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.011.

28. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, et al. A System for the Functional Evaluation of Reconstructive Procedures After Surgical Treatment of Tumors of the Musculoskeletal System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.

29. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K et al., on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd Edition). Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. 2001.

30. Hafner BJ, Gaunaurd IA, Morgan SJ, et al. Construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in adults with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026

31. Кaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychology. 1982;1(1):61–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.1.1.61

32. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. Ed. by CM MacLeod. NY: Columbia University Press. 1949:191–205.

33. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. NY: Springer. 1984.

34. Martin-Tellez KS., van Houdt WJ, van Coevorden F et al. Isolated limb perfusion for soft tissue sarcoma: Current practices and future directions. A survey of experts and a review of literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;88:102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102058.

35. Mason GE, Aung L, Gall S, et al. Quality of life following amputation or limb preservation in patients with lower extremity bone sarcoma. Front Oncol. 2013;3:210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00210

36. McKenzie L, van der Pol M. Mapping the EORTC QLQ C-30 onto the EQ-5D instrument: the potential to estimate QALYs without generic preference data. Value Health. 2009;12(1):167–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00405.x

37. Norlyk A, Martinsen B, Kjaer-Petersen K. Living with clipped wings–Patients’ experience of losing a leg. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2013;8:21891. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v8i0.21891.

38. Oaksford K, Frude N, Cuddihy R. Positive coping and stress-related psychological growth following lower limb amputation. Rehabil. Psychol. 2005;50(3):266–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.50.3.266

39. Padovani MT, Martins R., Venâncio A, et al. Anxiety, depression and quality of life in individuals with phantom limb pain. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015;23(2):107–110. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522015230200990.

40. Roffman C, Buchanan J, Allison G. Predictors of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation after discharge from rehabilitation: development and validation of clinical prediction rules. J Physiother. 2014;60(4):224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2014.09.003

41. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976;2(2):175–184. 42. Silva RS, Guilhem DB, Batista KT, et al. Quality of life of patients with sarcoma after conservative surgery or amputation of limbs. Acta Ortop Bras. 2019; 27(2):276–280. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192705219143.

42. Stutts LA, Stanaland AW. Posttraumatic growth in individuals with amputations. Disabil. Health J. 2016;9(1):167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.07.005

43. Watkins RG, O’Brien JP, Draugelis R, et al. Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative MMPI data in chronic back pain patient. Spine. 1986;11(4):385–390. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198605000-00018.

44. Young M, McKay C, Williams S., et al. Time-related changes in quality of life in persons with lower limb amputation or spinal cord injury: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1108-3.

45. Zidarov D, Swaine B, Gauthier-Gagnon C. Quality of life of persons with lower-limbamputation during rehabilitation and at 3-month follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(4):634–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.003.