Psychosocial characteristics of patients in a cosmetology clinic: results of a non-sample study

The relevance of the study is determined by the rapid development of medical cosmetology, which, unlike plastic surgery, has not been studied at all in psychological and sociological terms, although the effect of facial skin defects on the emotional state, social success, quality of life is beyond doubt, and their elimination significantly affects psychological well-being. patients. A practicing dermatologist-cosmetologist conducted a non-selective clinical and socio-psychological study of 188 patients (mean age 39.12+0.81 years) of a cosmetology clinic. The author’s structured interview and the medico-sociological scale «Level of social frustration» were used. According to 50 parameters, women with mild, moderate and significant severity of cosmetic problems were compared. Statistical methods of analysis were used (Pearson’s χ2 and ANOVA). An analysis of clinical data showed a relationship between the severity of a facial skin defect and its nature (symptoms), age, comorbid pathology, and treatment efficacy. Social positions (educational and labor status, nature of professional activity), significant spheres of personal relations (to oneself, to persons of the opposite sex, family relations, the presence and nature of mental trauma) were studied. Among the psychological and social characteristics, the characteristics of the family sphere, the reasons for visiting the clinic, and the patient›s subjective assessment of the impact of the cosmetic problem on the quality of life have a statistical relationship with the severity of the cosmetic problem and the age of the patients. The results are compared with the data of modern world literature. The limitations of the study associated with the use of non-standardized methods, which are relevant, however, to the tasks of a screening non-selective survey, are noted. The prospects for further studies of patients of the clinic for non-surgical correction of appearance using psychometric (standardized) methods are outlined.

1. Ababkov VA, Baryshnikova K, Vorontsova-Venger OV, Gorbunov IA, Kapranova SV, Pologayeva YeA, Stuklov KA. Validation of the Russian version of the questionnaire «Scale of perceived stress-10». Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2016;16(2):6-15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.202

2. Alexandrov AA, Bagnenko ES. Psychological characteristics of females with face skin defects. Vestnik psikhoterapii. 2012;41(46):52-66. (In Russ.).

3. Bagnenko ES. Psychological characteristics of women with problems of the facial skin: relationship with age, diagnosis, effectiveness of treatment. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva. 2021;55(3):62-72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2021-56-3-62-72

4. Bagnenko Ye.S. Tak li chasty dismorfofobii v kosmetologicheskoy praktike? Budushcheye klinicheskoy psikhologii. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsiya PGU. 2011. (In Russ.).

5. Varlashkina Ye.A. Lichnostnyye prediktory udovletvorennosti obrazom fizicheskogo Ya u zhenshchin v period zrelosti: Avtoref….dis. kand. psikhol.nauk. Omsk, 2015. (In Russ.).

6. Vasserman L.I., Berebin M.A., Iovlev B.V. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika urovnya so-tsial’noy frustrirovannosti. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika rasstroystv emotsio-nal’noy sfery lichnosti. Kollektivnaya monografiya. SPb.: Skifiya-print; 2014:187-213. (In Russ.).

7. Гришина Н.В. Экзистенциальная психология: учебник. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та. 2018. Grishina N.V. Ekzistentsial’naya psikhologiya: uchebnik. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta. 2018. (In Russ.).

8. Isurina G.L., Karvasarskiy B.D., Tashlykov V.A., Tupitsyn Yu.Ya. Razvitiye patogeneticheskoy kontseptsii nevrozov i psikhoterapii V.N. Myasishcheva na sovremennom etape. Teoriya i praktika meditsinskoy psikhologii i psikhoterapii: sb. nauchnykh trudov NIPNI im. V.M. Bekhtereva. SPb. 1994. (In Russ.).

9. Karavaeva TA, Korolkova TN. Psychological mechanisms and psychosomatic relationships in various dermatoses. Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya. 2018;17(5):7-17. (In Russ.). https: //doi.org/10.17116/klinderma2018170517

10. Leont’yev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroyeniye i dinamika smyslovoy real’-nosti. 3-ye izdaniye. M.: Smysl. 2007. (In Russ.).

11. Myasishchev V.N. Lichnost› i nevrozy. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1960. (In Russ.).

12. Neznanov NG, Vasilieva AV. Possibilities of the psychodynamic approach in the multidimesional model of the etiopathogenesis of dermatological diseases. Psikhiatricheskiye rasstroystva v obshchey meditsine. 2015;4:16-21. (In Russ.).

13. Neznanov N.G., Vasil’yeva A.V., Karavayeva T.A. Bolezn’ i zdorov’ye, psikhoterapiya i soperezhivaniye. 2-ye izd., pererab. i dop. SPb.: OOO Izdatel’skiy dom «Alef-Press», 2019. (In Russ.).

14. Осьминина А.А. Факторы удовлетворенности внешним обликом и активности в омоложении у женщин средней взрослости: Автореф. дис…. канд. психол. наук. Кострома, 2021.

15. Os›minina A.A. Faktory udovletvorennosti vneshnim oblikom i aktivnosti v omolozhenii u zhenshchin sredney vzroslosti: Avtoref. dis….kand. psikhol. nauk. Kostroma, 2021. (In Russ.).

16. Tkhostov A.Sh. Psikhologiya telesnosti. M.: Smysl; 2002. (In Russ.).

17. Tkhostov A.Sh., Nelyubina A.S. Kul’turno-istoricheskiy podkhod k psikhologii zdorov’ya: kul’turologiya, semiotika i mifologiya zdorov’ya. Rukovodstvo po psikhologii zdorov’ya. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta. 2019. (In Russ.).

18. Yarovaya NP, Araviyskaya YeR, Zuyeva VS, Skuratova KA, Shelepin YeYu. The relationship of self-attitude and oculomotor patterns in women’s perception of their own face. Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2021;18(1):22-33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2021.1.2

19. Balkrishnan R, McMichael A, Hu J et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes. Int. J. Dermatol. 2006;45(2):111-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02371.x.

20. Dadkhahfar S, Gheisari M, Kalantari Y, Zahedi K, Ehsani A, Ifa E. Motivations and characteristics of patients seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in two Iranian dermatology centers: A cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2021;18(7):737-742. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.07.001.

21. de Aquino MS, Haddad A, Ferreira LM. Assessment of quality of life in patients who underwent minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. A esthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(3):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-9992-0.

22. Dobosz M, Rogowska P, Sokołowska E, Szczerkowska-Dobosz A. Motivations, demography, and clinical features of body dysmorphic disorder among people seeking cosmetic treatments: A study of 199 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;00:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14890.

23. Hashim PW, Nia JK, Taliercio M, Goldenberg G. Ideals of facial beauty. Cutis. 2017;100(4):222-224.

24. Kurtti A, Charles C, Jagedo J. Combination Facial Aesthetic Treatment in Millennials. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(1):37-42. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.2022.6425.

25. Maisel A, Waldman A, Furlan K, Weil A, Sacotte K, Lazaroff JM et. al. Self-reported Patient Motivations for Seeking Cosmetic Procedures. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(10): 1167-1174. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2357.

26. Maisel A, Waldman A, Poon E, Alam M. Types of Cosmetic Procedures Requested by Different Types of Patients and the Reasons for These Preferences. Dermatol Surg. 2020; 46(12):1728-1732. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002632.

27. Mobayed N, Nguyen JK, Jagdeo J. Minimally Invasive Facial Cosmetic Procedures for the Millennial Aesthetic Patient. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(1):100-103. doi: 10.36849/JDD.2020.4641.

28. Özkur E, Kıvanç Altunay İ, Aydın Ç. Psychopathology among individuals seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. J. Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(4):939-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13101.

29. Pikoos TD, Rossell SL, Tzimas N, Buzwell S. Assessing Unrealistic Expectations in Clients Undertaking Minor Cosmetic Procedures: The Development of the Aesthetic Procedure Expectations Scale. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021;23(4):263-269. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0247.

30. Ribeiro F, Steiner D. Quality of life before and after cosmetic procedures on the face: A cross-sectional study in a public service. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(5):688-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12723.

31. Sadick NS. The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life. Dermatol Online J. 2008;14(8):2 [https://escholarship.org/]. Escholarship; 2008 [cited 19 march 2022]. Available: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7s4656k6

32. Scharschmidt D, Mirastschijski U, Preiss S, Brähler E, Fischer T, Borkenhagen A. body image, personality traits, and quality of life in botulinum toxin a and dermal filler patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(4):1119-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1165-3.

33. Scharschmidt D, Preiß S, Brähler E, Fischer T, Borkenhagen A. Body experience and self-esteem after minimally invasive skin rejuvenation: Study of female patients using botulinum toxin A and/ or dermal fillers. Hautarzt. 2017;68(12):959-967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-017-4066-5.

34. Sobanko JF, Taglienti AJ, Wilson AJ, Sarwer DB, Margolis DJ, Dai J, Percec I. Motivations for seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in an academic outpatient setting. Aesthet Surg J. 2015; 35(8):1014-1020. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv094.

35. Talley HL. Saving face: disfigurement and the politics of appearance. New York: University Press. 2014.

36. Weinkle SH, Werschler WP, Teller CF, Sykes JM, Shamban A, Rivkin A, et al. Impact of Comprehensive, Minimally Invasive, Multimodal Aesthetic Treatment on Satisfaction With Facial Appearance: The HARMONY Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(5):540-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx179.