Preview

V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY

Advanced search

Debatable positions of DSM-V and new forms of the organization of the psychiatric help for patients with endogenic mental disorders

Abstract

Diagnostics of schizophrenia at early stages represents significant difficulties. In this connection authors of the article express their opinion about diagnostic section «Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome» including in DSM V, which is remaining to be most debatable and suggest to pay greater attention prodromal symptoms of schizophrenia which in a number of scientific publications are considered within the limits of a psychosis risk syndrome However the existing fragmentation in activity of medical institutions in rendering the psychiatric help complicates duly carrying out of necessary diagnostic and therapeutic actions at early phase of mental disorders that demands a creation of new forms of the psychiatric help. One of them could become a complex «a round-the-clock hospital (with the open doors) - a day time hospital» which, in turn, can exist within the limits of the Mental Health Center functioning in structure of V. M. Bekhterev Psychoneurological Institute, where patients at a stage of preillness could address, being observed in the further, in case of need, and at the other stages of mental disorders. Such form of the organization of psychiatric unit will promote specification of criteria for different stage of schizophrenia spectrum disorders including Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome of DSM-V as allows to organize patient’s treatment process by one doctor at various stages of disease, that allows to avoid a various estimation of a condition at supervision of the patient by doctors of different psychiatric units.

About the Authors

A. P. Kotsiubinsky
The Saint-Petersburg V.M. Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute
Russian Federation


B. G. Butoma
The Saint-Petersburg V.M. Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute
Russian Federation


References

1. Аутохтонные непсихотические расстройства / под ред. А.П. Коцюбинского. - СПб. - Спец-Лит. - 2015. - 495 с.

2. Гиляровский В.А. Психиатрия / Руководство для врачей и студентов. - Л.: Биомедгиз. - 1935. - 750 с.

3. Инструмент по оценке предрасположенности к шизофрении (SPI-A). Взрослая версия (SPI-A) / Ф. Шультце-Лютер и др.: пер. М. Скугаревская, А Элисон // ISBN E-book: 9788895930572.

4. Коцюбинский А.П., Бутома Б.Г. Стационарное отделение (с открытыми дверями) и дневной стационар как новая организационная форма в современной концепции реабилитации психически больных // Психотерапия и психосоциальная работа в психиатрии. Выпуск III / Под. ред. О.В. Лиманкина, С.М. Бабина. - Спб.: Изд-во «Таро». - 2016. - С. 132-140.

5. Лиманкин О.В., Спикина А.А., Парфенов Ю.А., Отмахов А,/П. Оценка эффективности ведения больных параноидной шизофренией в стационарном и амбулаторнеом звене // Социальная и клиническая психиатрия. - 2016. - Т.26.

6. Мазаева H.A. Ранние превентивные вмешательства при эндогенных болезнях: реальность и и перспективы // Психиатрия и психофармакотерапия. Журн. им. П.Б. Ганнушкина. - 2010. - Т. 12.- Вып. 5. - С. 720-726.

7. Медведев В.Э. Диагностика латентного течения и первого эпизода шизофрении (обзор зарубежной литературы) // Психиатрия и психофармакотерапия. Журн. им. П.Б. Ганнушкина. - 2012. - Т. 14. - Вып. 6. - С. 65-69.

8. Семичев С.Б. Предполезненые психические расстройства - Л.: Медицина. - 1987. - 1987. - 132.

9. Скугаревский О.А., Скугаревская М.М. Возможности ранней диагностики и профилактики психозов // Вестник психиатрии и психологии Чувашии. - 2015. - Т. 11. - № 2. - С. 10-24.

10. Смулевич А.Б. Расстройства личности. Траектория в пространстве психической и соматической патологии. - М.: Медицинское информационное агентство. - 2012. 331 с.

11. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association. - 2013. - 970 p.

12. Cannon T.D., Cadenhead K., Cornblatt B. [et al.]. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America // Arch. Gen. Psychiat. - 2008. - Vol. 65. - N.1. - P. 28-37.

13. Häfner H., Maurer K., Luffler W. [et al.]. The ABC schizophrenia study: a preliminary overview of the results // Soc. Psychiat. Epid. - 1998 - Vol.33. - N. 8. - P. 380-386.

14. Klosterkotter J, Hellmich M, Steinmeyer E. M. [et al]. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase // Arch. Gen/ Psychiat. - 2001. - Vol. 58. - N.2. - P. 158-164.

15. Klosterkotter J., Schultze-Lutter F., Bechdolf A., Ruhrmann S. Prediction and prevention of schizophrenia: what has been achieved and where to go next? // World Psychiat. - 2011. - Vol. 10. N. 3 (Oct). - P. 165-174.

16. Mayer-Gross W. Die Klinik der Schizophrenie. Verlauf und Ausgang //. Hanbuch der Giesteskrankheiten / Hrsg.O.Bumke - Bd. 9. - Spez. Teil V. Die Schizophrenie. - Berlin: Springer, 1932. - Р. 293- 578.

17. McGlashan T. H., Walsh B., Wood S. The Psychosis-Risk Syndrom: Handbook for Diagnostic and Follow-up. - Oxford University Press, USA. - 2010. - 234 p.

18. McGorry P.D., Hickie I.B., Yung A.R. [et al.]. Clinical stagigng of psychotic disorders: A heuristic framework for choosing earlier. Safer and more effective intervention // Aust. N.Z. Journ. Psychiat. - 2006. - Vol. 40. - P. 616-622.

19. Miller T.J., McGlashan T.H., Rosen J.L. [et al.]. Prospective diagnosis of the initial prodrome for schizophrenia based on the structured interview for prodromal syndromes: preliminary evidence of interrater reliability and predictive validity // Amer. Journ. Psychiat. - 2002. - Vol. 159. - N. 5. - P. 863-865.

20. Moller P., Husby R. The initial prodrome in schizoprenia: searching for naturalistic dimension of expirience and behaviour // Schizophr. Bull. - 2000. - Vol. 26. - N. 1. - P. 217. - 232.

21. Nordentoft M., Thorup A., Petersen L. [et al.].Transition rates from schizotypal disorder to psychotic disorder for first-contact patients included in the OPUS trial. A randomized clinical trial of integrated treatment and standard // Schizophr. Res. - 2006. - Vol. 83. - N. 1. - P. 29-40.

22. Pamas J. Genetics and psychopathology of spectrum phenotypes // Acta Psychiat. Scand. - 2000. - Vol. 101. - P. 413-415.23.

23. Pamas J, Bovet P., Zahavi D. Schizophrenic autism: clinical phenomenology and pathogenetic implications // World Psycyiat. - 2002.- Vol. 101. - P.413 -415

24. Pamas J., Handest P., Saebye D. [et al.]. Anomalies of subjective experience in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar illness // Acta Psychiat. Scand. - 2003. - Vol. 108. - P. 126-133.

25. Pamas J., Raballo A., Handest P. [et al.]. Selfexperience in the early phases of schizophrenia: 5-year follow-up of the Copenhagen Prodromal Study// World Psychiat. - 2011. - Vol. 10. - N. 3. - P.2040-2044.

26. Phillips L.J., Yung A.R., McGorry P.D. Identification of young people at risk of psychosis: validation of personal assessment and crisis evaluation clinic intake criteria // Aust. N. Z. Journ. Psychiat. - 2000. - Vol. 34. - Suppl: S. 164-169.

27. Raballo A., Saebye D., Pamas J. Looking at the schizophrenia spectrum through the prism of self-disorders: an empirical study// Schizophr. Bull. - 2011. - Vol. 37. - N. 2. - P. 344-351.

28. Ruhrmann S., Schultze-Lutter F., Salokangas R. K. [et al.]. Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adultsa at high risk: results from the prospective prediction study // Arch. Gen. Psychiat. - 2010. - Vol. 67. - N. 3. - P. 241-251.

29. Schultze-Lutter F. Subjective symptoms of schizoprenia in research and the clinic. // Schizophr. Bull. - 2009. - Vol. 35. - N. 1. - P. 5- 8.

30. Schultze-Lutter F., Ruhrmann S., Klosterkotter J. Can schizoprenia be predicted phenomenologically // Evolving psychosis. Different stages, different treatment / Eds. J. O. Johannessen, B. Martindale, J. Cullberg, London: Routledge, 2006. - P. 104-123.

31. Schultze-Lutter F., Steinmeyer E. M., Ruhrmann S. [et al.]. The dimensional structure of self-reported «prodromal» disturbances in scyizoprenia // Clin. Neuropsychiat. - 2008.- Vol. 5. - P.140-150.

32. Schultze-Lutter F., Ruhrmann S., Beming J. [et al.]. Basic symptoms and ultra high risk criteria: symptom development in the initial prodromal state // Schizophr. Bull. - 2010. - Vol. 36. - N. 1. - P. 182- 191.

33. Simon A.E., Dvorsky D.N., Boesch J. [et al.]. Defining subjects at risk for psychosis: a comparison of two approaches // Schizophr. Res. - 2006. - Vol. 81. - N. 1. - P. 83- 90.

34. Woods S.W., Addington J., Cadenhead K. S. [et al.]. Validity of the prodromal risk syndrome forfirst psychosis: findings from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study // Schizophr. Bull. - 2009. - Vol. 35. № 5 - 894-908.

35. Yung A.R., Yuen H.P., McGorry P.D. [et al.]. Mapping the onset of psychosis: the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states // Aust. N. Z. Journ. Psychiat. - 2005. - Vol. 39. - N. 11-12. - P. 964-971.


Review

For citations:


Kotsiubinsky A.P., Butoma B.G. Debatable positions of DSM-V and new forms of the organization of the psychiatric help for patients with endogenic mental disorders. V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2016;(4):13-16. (In Russ.)

Views: 499


ISSN 2313-7053 (Print)
ISSN 2713-055X (Online)